Circus Bear On Hoverboard Attacks Handler, Pinning Him To The Ground

In a shocking incident during a live performance in Russia’s Altay Kray region, a circus bear named Donut attacked her handler, Sergei Prichinich. Donut, a 490-pound brown bear, was performing on a hoverboard when she suddenly lunged at Prichinich, knocking him to the ground. The audience watched in horror as the bear pinned him down, creating a tense situation that could have turned fatal. Despite the terrifying moment, Prichinich remained calm, and the show continued after the bear released him. The incident has reignited debate over the use of animals in circus performances, as critics demand change in the industry.

A Shocking Turn of Events

The incident took place during a performance in central Russia, where Donut, the brown bear, had been entertaining the crowd by gliding on a hoverboard. Without warning, she lunged toward her handler, Sergei Prichinich, knocking him to the ground. “She snapped at Sergei and wrestled with him,” said Nikita Mikhailov, the head of the Moretti Circus. In the tense moments that followed, Donut held Prichinich down, biting at the stick he was holding. While audience members feared for his life, Prichinich displayed remarkable composure, waiting for the bear to calm down before getting back on his feet.

Calm Under Pressure

Throughout the ordeal, Prichinich remained composed, an essential tactic that likely saved him from further harm. According to Mikhailov, the trainer didn’t resist the bear’s sudden aggression. “He waited for the bear to calm down, then continued the routine, sealing it all with a kiss,” Mikhailov explained. This calm reaction is crucial in such situations, as wild animals can become more agitated by resistance. The performance shockingly continued after the incident, with both the trainer and Donut showing no signs of injury. However, the incident left many questioning the risks circus performers face daily.

Animal Welfare in Question

The use of animals in circuses remains a controversial topic, particularly in countries like Russia, where it is still legal. Donut’s attack has added fuel to the ongoing debate over animal welfare in entertainment. Animal rights advocate Yuri Koretskikh, a leading voice in efforts to ban animals in circuses, remarked, “While the rest of the world is moving towards humane circus acts, Russia’s circus lobby resists progress, defending its commercial interests.” He emphasized that audiences are growing tired of seeing animals in distressing situations, furthering calls for change in the industry.

A Dangerous Tradition

In Russia, circuses have long used animals in their acts, ranging from hoverboarding bears to those made to “box” in rings. Many argue that these performances not only put animals at risk but also endanger the trainers. Donut’s attack is not an isolated incident, but it has highlighted the dangers of these traditional shows. “This is an animal, and they can behave differently, they may not like something,” Mikhailov stated, suggesting that even the best-trained animals can act unpredictably under the spotlight. These unpredictable moments underline the inherent risk that trainers face while working with wild animals in such environments.

Calls for Change

Despite the widespread concerns, Russia’s circus lobby continues to resist efforts to phase out animals from performances. Animal rights campaigners like Koretskikh argue that change is inevitable. “Modern circuses around the world are evolving, embracing performances without animals, but Russia lags behind,” he said. Public sentiment also seems to be shifting, with more people expressing discomfort over the use of animals for entertainment. Donut’s attack on Prichinich could be a pivotal moment, reigniting the call for stricter regulations—or even a ban—on animals in circus performances.

This content has, in part, been generated with the aid of an artificial intelligence language model. While we strive for accuracy and quality, please note that the information provided may not be entirely error-free or up-to-date. We recommend independently verifying the content and consulting with professionals for specific advice or information. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the use or interpretation of this content.