In a recent episode of “The Brian Kilmeade Show,” Ben Shapiro, co-founder of The Daily Wire and host of “The Ben Shapiro Show,” delves into the political maneuvers and controversial stances of Vice President Kamala Harris. As Shapiro outlines, Harris’s far-left record, her candidacy ahead of November, and her stance on Israel following Netanyahu’s congressional address, are focal points of concern and debate. This article breaks down the key points discussed by Shapiro, providing a comprehensive analysis of Harris’s political trajectory and its implications.
Introduction
Kamala Harris has been a polarizing figure in American politics, particularly since assuming the role of Vice President. As the election season heats up, her political strategies and past record are under intense scrutiny. In his appearance on “The Brian Kilmeade Show,” Ben Shapiro offers a critical perspective on Harris’s actions and rhetoric. From her tenure as Attorney General of California to her current vice-presidential role, Shapiro argues that Harris’s shifting stances reveal a deeper strategy aimed at appealing to a broad electorate while maintaining her progressive base.
The Phases of Kamala Harris’s Career
Attorney General of California
Harris’s political journey began as the Attorney General of California, where she established a reputation on crime policies that are now contentious. Shapiro highlights that during this period, Harris’s actions and inactions on various criminal justice issues have been both praised and criticized. Her prosecutorial decisions are now being revisited and scrutinized in light of her national ambitions.
Senator Kamala Harris
As a senator, Harris’s rhetoric became more aggressive, particularly towards agencies like ICE, which she likened to the KKK. This phase marked her transition towards more progressive positions, aligning herself with far-left policies. Shapiro points out that Harris advocated for the decriminalization of border crossings, the abolition of fracking, and defunding the police – positions that resonated with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party but also sparked significant controversy.
Presidential Candidate
During her presidential campaign, Harris’s platform included several bold proposals, such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. However, her campaign struggled to gain traction, leading to a shift in her strategy. Shapiro argues that Harris’s presidential bid was marked by inconsistency and a failure to clearly articulate her policies, resulting in her early exit from the race.
Vice President
As Vice President, Harris was assigned significant responsibilities, such as handling the border crisis. Shapiro criticizes her handling of these tasks, suggesting that her performance has been inadequate. Furthermore, Harris’s recent shifts on key issues, such as fracking and border policy, are seen by Shapiro as attempts to rebrand herself as a moderate – a move he believes lacks authenticity.
Kamala Harris’s Current Strategy
Rebranding as a Moderate
Shapiro argues that Harris is currently attempting to portray herself as a moderate to appeal to a broader electorate. This rebranding involves distancing herself from some of her more progressive positions. For example, Harris has recently softened her stance on issues like fracking and the decriminalization of border crossings. Shapiro sees this as a strategic move to gain wider acceptance, especially in swing states.
The Media’s Role
According to Shapiro, the media has played a significant role in shaping public perception of Harris. He suggests that the media has been largely favorable to Harris, often downplaying her inconsistencies and controversial stances. This media support, Shapiro argues, has created a “sugar high” for Harris’s candidacy, masking deeper issues that may become more apparent as the election approaches.
Harris’s Stance on Israel
A significant portion of Shapiro’s critique focuses on Harris’s stance on Israel, particularly after Netanyahu’s congressional address. Shapiro condemns Harris’s comments, which he interprets as favoring Hamas and criticizing Israel’s actions in Gaza. He argues that Harris’s position is dangerous and undermines a key ally. Shapiro believes that her stance reflects an attempt to appease the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, which has increasingly taken a critical view of Israel.
Conclusion
Ben Shapiro’s analysis presents Kamala Harris as a politician with a complex and evolving strategy. From her early days as Attorney General of California to her current role as Vice President, Harris has navigated a series of political landscapes, each requiring different approaches and stances. Shapiro’s critique highlights the challenges Harris faces in balancing her progressive base with the need to appeal to a broader electorate. As the election nears, it remains to be seen whether her rebranding efforts will succeed or if her past record and shifting positions will hinder her candidacy.
For a more in-depth look at Ben Shapiro’s analysis, watch the full episode of “The Brian Kilmeade Show” featuring Shapiro’s discussion on Kamala Harris.
This detailed exploration of Kamala Harris’s political journey and current strategies offers insight into the complexities of her candidacy and the broader implications for the upcoming election.
